[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” _builder_version=”4.16″ global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” _builder_version=”4.16″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”|||” global_colors_info=”{}” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.25.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
When thinking of Consent theoretically, I think of it as a complicated, many-faceted phenomen. This is something that I want to remind in this text. In our (production-based) practical work, it often not productive to start to think of consent in its full complexity. Within an educational context, I like to remind people that consent is a space. In this article, I want to present consent first from practical point of view of CRISP Consent and then from a more theoretical point of view of Consent Space.<\/p>\n